James G. Wright, editor of the Times-News who two weeks ago spent an hour on "Zeb at the Ranch," feels that the comment made in that appearance and attributed to him in this post was taken out of context and his words misconstrued.
Anyone who stands up and takes a stand and doesn't waffle out from under it if someone disagrees with them is going to get heat. If somebody on the left wants to call that hate speech or whatever, they can. I mean, it's just speech. Unless they're shootin' at ya pal, it's not that bad. It's just talk.
The comment was characterized in the post by saying, "[The Times-News] editor not only dismissed the consequences of hate speech, he essentially endorsed [Zeb Bell's] view that he's under attack from liberals who don't like his 'moral values.'"
In a comment exchange following the post where I was also critical of the paper's failure to report on issues of racism, Wright essentially says his intent was not to imply that hate speech was just speech but that he was telling Bell he was making himself out to be a victim. (There's more; go read if you're interested.)
While I take Wright at his word that it wasn't his intent, I stand by the original characterization that the statement did minimize the consequences of hate speech. To satisfy his request, here, without further commentary and, hopefully, plenty of context, is a roughly eight-minute audio clip from James Wright's April 8th appearance on "Zeb at the Ranch."
The first minute or so of the clip came about five minutes into the interview and the remaining seven minutes is a bit from the last thirty minutes of the hour-long interview.