Seen alongside a rural road in Canyon County June 22, 2010
Will money buy Idaho Congressman Walt Minnick one more term or will Idaho voters ignore conventional wisdom, leaving both of the heavily-favored money interests in the 2010 1st Congressional District race washed up? We'll know in four months.
CQ Politics, the perennial inside-the-beltway congressional news source, is practically giddy over Minnick's second quarter fundraising numbers. Writes John McArdle:
The fundraising numbers, coupled with the primary loss of the GOP's nationally recruited and heavily endorsed candidate, Vaughn Ward, to the grassroots-organized long shot, State Rep. Raul Labrador, prompted CQ Roll Call to move the race for Idaho's 1st CD from "tossup" to "leans Democratic."Freshman Rep. Walt Minnick (D) raised an impressive $410,000 for his re-election effort from April to June, putting his total raised for the cycle at over $1.9 million. Minnick, whose second-quarter fundraising performance was his best this cycle by far, began July with more than $1.1 million in cash on hand. Minnick's strong fundraising numbers top off what has been a good couple of weeks for the Congressman.
Conventional wisdom would call that a reasonable move, but Idaho voters are rarely impressed by conventional wisdom.
With CQ even describing the Labrador campaign as "low-budget," Ward took a 6-1 money advantage into the May primary, then stunned the establishment with his late-inning campaign meltdown, leaving inside and outside the beltway pundits gaping at the enormity of the fall.
The takeaway? Money can buy you many things, but it can't buy you love and it can't always buy you a congressional seat.
Your takeaway is a little off. "Money can buy you many things, but it can't buy you an election if you continue to make massive screw-ups, plagiarize, and be an all around just *horrible* candidate". Walt is vetted. We know he's not going to make the kind of rookie mistakes that Vaughn Ward did.
I love ya, MG, but I wish you'd give Walt a break. He's twice as good as Labrador and he needs our support. Intimating that he is somehow attempting to "buy" an election is . . .well, it's not helping.
Posted by: ReggieHolmquist@u.boisestate.edu | July 14, 2010 at 03:26 AM
1. The takeaway was spot on: Money isn't always enough to buy an election.
2. Walt was vetted by whom?
3. "Twice as good as Labrador" ... not exactly reassuring.
4. Yes, Walt *needs* our support but he hasn't earned it and he won't get mine. "If you win by selling out the party, who cares who wins?"
Walt placed himself in the center of the herd as Idaho Republicans stampeded over the teabagger cliff, and now he finds himself in a precarious position dangling from a ledge on that cliff. That he isn't at the bottom isn't exactly reassuring and I'll continue pointing out that he is in fact dangling from this ledge in an effort to pull him back from it. You're welcome to follow him over it if you like.
Posted by: MountainGoat | July 14, 2010 at 08:37 AM