Governor Butch Otter threw a hissy fit yesterday vetoing ten bills, sending a message to the Idaho Legislature, particularly the House, that he was not pleased that they failed to increase fuel taxes and other transportation fees to raise funds for road maintenance. Today, the hissy fit grew by more than a factor of three as the governor vetoed twenty-five more budget bills when the entrenched House failed again to pass a gas tax increase, making this hot-for-April day in Boise even more stifling for legislators.
In day one hundred and counting—at thirty-five bills and counting—this legislative session is far from over. Where it will end is anyone's guess at this point, but as Eye On Boise reports, Otter's message to the legislature is, "They need to know that I’m serious."
I think they get the point.
I think we all get the point and at $30,000 a day, sending the bill for the session over the $3 million mark, it could turn into an expensive game of chicken for taxpayers. Meanwhile school budgets are being cut, state employees are facing pay cuts or layoffs and the poor, elderly and disabled are being told there isn't enough money to go around.
So the Republican legislature and the Republican governor keep shoveling taxpayer money into the furnace, raising the heat and the stakes in the capitol city until the other side caves. Raise taxes or keep shoveling. And all over what? Road maintenance.
This is what the governor is willing to throw down over... not the poor, not the elderly, not the disabled, not you, not me, not your kids—road maintenance. Maybe we could all chip in and buy the governor a new pair of jeans. Obviously his have become too tight and there's nothing at all hot about that.

Excellent post, MG. This is what we get with one-party government, and it ain't pretty.
As for Otter, the last governor to veto this many bills was Don Samuelson in 1967. He wound up a one-termer, defeated in 1970 by Cece Andrus.
Posted by: Julie Fanselow | April 22, 2009 at 09:58 AM
However, the quick veto stamping power of Samuelson isn't why he wound up a one-termer.
Posted by: thepoliticalgame | April 22, 2009 at 12:15 PM
TPG, do tell more. Was it the White Clouds mining gambit that did in Samuelson, or something else? (I've heard he wasn't the sharpest tool in the shed ...)
Posted by: Julie Fanselow | April 22, 2009 at 04:35 PM